Constitutional Morality in India: A Pillar of Justice and Democratic Values

Abstract

The Indian Constitution's laws and principles, such as the "basic structure," "arbitrariness," and "manifest arbitrariness," represent the judiciary's role in interpreting and defining constitutional principles. Constitutional morality, while not explicitly acknowledged at first, has grown as a key concept highlighting dedication to values such as justice, equality, liberty, and fraternity. It directs judicial decisions to be consistent with the spirit of the Constitution, promoting social justice, upholding fundamental rights, and preserving public trust. Landmark cases, such as Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India (2018), demonstrate its importance in putting human dignity ahead of societal prejudices. Despite difficulties such as political meddling and case backlogs, constitutional morality and judicial ideals are still essential for providing fairness, inclusion, and the continued relevance of justice in India.